Argumentation Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Argumentation - Research Paper Examplecasualties while maximizing destruction and death abroad. That Obama was elected through the use of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Mahatma Gandhi, and deliverer Christ in his moral rhetoric makes the use of violent force in government indemnity problematic. For example, if we are to ask whether these teachers accept the use of destructive force and violence as a means to solve political problems or social issues, the answer would be an unequivocal no not in any instance. It can be further argued that by invoking MLK, Gandhi, his Christian faith, and his unique family history, the President communicated a point of view to the electorate that was expressive of his moral sense of identity. If Obama as President continues to pursue what the Washington Times describes as neoconservative policies through military action abroad, he is indeed going against the moral tone that he communicated to his base in callking election and should be held accountabl e in the upcoming 2012 election for it. The Washington Times (2011) writes in the editorial Mr. ... For now anyway. Mr. Obamas motive - trying to dislodge an authoritarian regime in the name of the Libyan people - are solidly within the neoconservative framework. (Washington Times, 2011) The article is curb in space but could have clearly noted that Obama has pursued the Just War doctrine through his policy of escalation in Afghanistan and Pakistan while drafting down in Iraq, and Libya is the latest example of that policy. President Obamas 2009 Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech can be seen as one of the principal(prenominal) locations where he develops the Just War doctrine and with it his reasons why he cannot or will not implement a purely pacifist foreign policy as advocated by Gandhi and MLK particularly. (NYT, 2009) What the Washington Times suggests is that at heart Obama is no different that Nixon or Eisenhower, who like the majority of Americans would believe in Christ ianity and not see it as inconsistent with war. Yet, the Washington Times is not writing the editorial to advocate the position of MLK and Gandhi in politics, they are writing to exult with glee as Obama again sells these principles bulge out and the moral Left writhes in agony. The implication of this tone is happier still in that the writers expect that Obama will likely lose the election, having sold out his moral base continually throughout his administration. Following the Washington Times arguments, it is easy to view the Obama administrations economic policies as no accredited change from the neo-conservative Bush administration. President Obama continued the Wall St.bailout policies enacted by the Bush administration as well as expanding them. President Obamas majority-led Congress all-encompassing the Bush tax cuts in another example of neo-conservative policy.